Why Desktop Touch Screens Don’t Really Work Well For Humans

Your Ad Here

touchsmart 215x172 Why Desktop Touch Screens Don’t Really Work Well For HumansHewlett Packard refreshed their TouchSmart line of computers today. If you’re not familiar with these, imagine an iMac all in one computer that has a touch screen, and you’re most of the way there.

I really like the TouchSmart line, and use a second generation machine as my main Windows test computer. The touch interface is done via infrared, which is a very cost effective way of creating a touch interface on a large screen. Microsoft, in fact, uses it in their experimental TouchWall product that can make a touch screen of virtually any size wall (more TouchWall footage).

Overall I give the TouchScmart top marks – the only drawback is that it is inexplicably heavy at something like 60 lbs., and no one seems to know why. But since it sits on your desk, it’s not like you’re lifting it very often, so it doesn’t really matter.

But the machine is still all wrong. Anyone who has used one for a long time will tell you that they quickly revert to using the keyboard and mouse. And it isn’t because of the software or touch technology – both are fine.

 Why Desktop Touch Screens Don’t Really Work Well For Humans

 Why Desktop Touch Screens Don’t Really Work Well For Humans

 Why Desktop Touch Screens Don’t Really Work Well For Humans  Why Desktop Touch Screens Don’t Really Work Well For Humans  Why Desktop Touch Screens Don’t Really Work Well For Humans

Related News